“You seem to consider the judges the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges … and their power [are] the more dangerous as they are in office for life, and are not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots. It has more wisely made all the departments co-equal and co-sovereign within themselves … . When the legislative or executive functionaries act unconstitutionally, they are responsible to the people in their elective capacity. The exemption of the judges from that is quite dangerous enough. I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society, but the people themselves. …” — Jefferson, Letter to Mr. Jarvis, Sept, 1820
This case of Marbury and Madison is continually cited by bench and bar, as if it were settled law, without any animadversions on its being merely an obiter dissertation of the Chief Justice … . But the Chief Justice says, “there must be an ultimate arbiter somewhere.” True, there must; but … . The ultimate arbiter is the people …. — Jefferson Letter to Judge William Johnson, June 1823
When will conservative media pull up the old videos of Mexico politicians running a campaign on taking back the land of the USA – calling Los Angeles, Mexico. While we are not at war, the promised an invasion. Their plan was to simply move in, like the claim American did to the Indian, and simply take control. Invasion, predatory intrusion – certainly seems they declared it so!
REMOVE THESE JUDGES! REMOVE THEM! REMOVE THEM ALL!
Let’s start an investigation based upon Judge Davis’ courtroom confrontation with VP Vance. Follow the $$$ and build an historical case.
Revisit the issue as recommended by Jefferson:
“You seem to consider the judges the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges … and their power [are] the more dangerous as they are in office for life, and are not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots. It has more wisely made all the departments co-equal and co-sovereign within themselves … . When the legislative or executive functionaries act unconstitutionally, they are responsible to the people in their elective capacity. The exemption of the judges from that is quite dangerous enough. I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society, but the people themselves. …” — Jefferson, Letter to Mr. Jarvis, Sept, 1820
This case of Marbury and Madison is continually cited by bench and bar, as if it were settled law, without any animadversions on its being merely an obiter dissertation of the Chief Justice … . But the Chief Justice says, “there must be an ultimate arbiter somewhere.” True, there must; but … . The ultimate arbiter is the people …. — Jefferson Letter to Judge William Johnson, June 1823
When will conservative media pull up the old videos of Mexico politicians running a campaign on taking back the land of the USA – calling Los Angeles, Mexico. While we are not at war, the promised an invasion. Their plan was to simply move in, like the claim American did to the Indian, and simply take control. Invasion, predatory intrusion – certainly seems they declared it so!
Yes, exactly. Mass population transfer. Publications dating back to the 1920s. And, see how it has worked so well for Mexico.